cv
Please download it.
Basics
Name | Muhammad Moeenuddin |
Label | Scientist |
getmoeen@gmail.com | |
Phone | (0092) |
Url | https://moeenuddin.github.io/ |
Summary | A Data specialist |
Work
-
2015.09 - 2024.01
Volunteer
-
2024.08 - 2024.09 Peshawar
Education
-
2009.08 - 2012.04 Lahore, Pakistan
MS
Lahore university of management science, Pakistan
Software Development, Data mining and A.I, Recommendation system
- Adv Topics in Data mining
Awards
- 2001.08.01
Certificates
Machine Learning | ||
Stanford University | 2025-01-01 |
Publications
-
2015.09.01 An Unsupervised Method for Discovering Lexical Variations in Roman Urdu Informal Text
ACL
We present an unsupervised method to find lexical variations in Roman Urdu informal text. Our method includes a phonetic algorithm UrduPhone, a feature-based similarity function, and a clustering algorithm Lex-C. UrduPhone encodes roman Urdu strings to their phonetic equivalent representations. This produces an initial grouping of different spelling variations of a word. The similarity function incorporates word features and their context. Lex-C is a variant of k-medoids clustering algorithm that group lexical variations. It incorporates a similarity threshold to balance the number of clusters and their maximum similarity. We test our system on two datasets of SMS and blogs and show an f-measure gain of up to 12% from baseline systems.
-
2014.06.05 Understanding Types of Users on Twitter
Researchgate
People use microblogging platforms like Twitter to involve with other users for a wide range of interests and practices. Twitter profiles run by different types of users such as humans, bots, spammers, businesses and professionals. This research work identifies six broad classes of Twitter users, and employs a supervised machine learning approach which uses a comprehensive set of features to classify users into the identified classes. For this purpose, we exploit users' profile and tweeting behavior information. We evaluate our approach by performing 10-fold cross validation using manually annotated 716 different Twitter profiles. High classification accuracy (measured using AUC, and precision, recall) reveals the significance of the proposed approach.
-
2011.12.22 Personalized versus non-personalized tag recommendation: A suitability study on three social networks
IEEE INMIC
Tag recommendation systems are either personalized or non-personalized. Personalized tag recommendation utilizes a user's tagging behavior from her tagging history for predictions. Whereas non-personalized recommendation systems recommend what is popular and relevant to the user. In this study, we have analyzed the role of personal tagging history in recommending tags. The experiments are done on three folksonomy datasets: Delicious, Flickr and Bibsonomy. Important results for three popular tag recommendation algorithms: PITF, FolkRank and Adapted PageRank are reported in terms of prediction quality. It is found that users' history usage preferences change across all data sets; hence overall prediction quality of personalized recommendation system may suffer. We discover a generic life cycle of folksonomy users on the basis of their history usage. We propose this life cycle can be used to improved.
Skills
Data Analysis | |
Big Data | |
Predictive Modeling | |
Behavior Analysis | |
Data steward |
Languages
Urdu | |
Native speaker |
English | |
Fluent |
Interests
Online Social behavior | |
Recommendation system | |
Team interactions | |
Machine learning | |
NLP | |
Trusthworthy AI |
References
Imran Gondal | |
Director Development, Discourse analytics |
Professor Asim Karim | |
Lums |
Projects
- 2024.06 - 2024.08