cv

Please download it.

Basics

Name Muhammad Moeenuddin
Label Scientist
Email getmoeen@gmail.com
Phone (0092)
Url https://moeenuddin.github.io/
Summary A Data specialist

Work

Volunteer

  • 2024.08 - 2024.09

    Peshawar

    Industry Advisor
    FAST NUCES
    Advisor to the Industry Advisory Board

Education

  • 2009.08 - 2012.04

    Lahore, Pakistan

    MS
    Lahore university of management science, Pakistan
    Software Development, Data mining and A.I, Recommendation system
    • Adv Topics in Data mining

Awards

Certificates

Machine Learning
Stanford University 2025-01-01

Publications

  • 2015.09.01
    An Unsupervised Method for Discovering Lexical Variations in Roman Urdu Informal Text
    ACL
    We present an unsupervised method to find lexical variations in Roman Urdu informal text. Our method includes a phonetic algorithm UrduPhone, a feature-based similarity function, and a clustering algorithm Lex-C. UrduPhone encodes roman Urdu strings to their phonetic equivalent representations. This produces an initial grouping of different spelling variations of a word. The similarity function incorporates word features and their context. Lex-C is a variant of k-medoids clustering algorithm that group lexical variations. It incorporates a similarity threshold to balance the number of clusters and their maximum similarity. We test our system on two datasets of SMS and blogs and show an f-measure gain of up to 12% from baseline systems.
  • 2014.06.05
    Understanding Types of Users on Twitter
    Researchgate
    People use microblogging platforms like Twitter to involve with other users for a wide range of interests and practices. Twitter profiles run by different types of users such as humans, bots, spammers, businesses and professionals. This research work identifies six broad classes of Twitter users, and employs a supervised machine learning approach which uses a comprehensive set of features to classify users into the identified classes. For this purpose, we exploit users' profile and tweeting behavior information. We evaluate our approach by performing 10-fold cross validation using manually annotated 716 different Twitter profiles. High classification accuracy (measured using AUC, and precision, recall) reveals the significance of the proposed approach.
  • 2011.12.22
    Personalized versus non-personalized tag recommendation: A suitability study on three social networks
    IEEE INMIC
    Tag recommendation systems are either personalized or non-personalized. Personalized tag recommendation utilizes a user's tagging behavior from her tagging history for predictions. Whereas non-personalized recommendation systems recommend what is popular and relevant to the user. In this study, we have analyzed the role of personal tagging history in recommending tags. The experiments are done on three folksonomy datasets: Delicious, Flickr and Bibsonomy. Important results for three popular tag recommendation algorithms: PITF, FolkRank and Adapted PageRank are reported in terms of prediction quality. It is found that users' history usage preferences change across all data sets; hence overall prediction quality of personalized recommendation system may suffer. We discover a generic life cycle of folksonomy users on the basis of their history usage. We propose this life cycle can be used to improved.

Skills

Data Analysis
Big Data
Predictive Modeling
Behavior Analysis
Data steward

Languages

Urdu
Native speaker
English
Fluent

Interests

Online Social behavior
Recommendation system
Team interactions
Machine learning
NLP
Trusthworthy AI

References

Imran Gondal
Director Development, Discourse analytics
Professor Asim Karim
Lums

Projects